AMD Strix Halo — llama.cpp Toolboxes (Benchmarks)

Live results: https://kyuz0.github.io/amd-strix-halo-toolboxes/

Filter by model name, size, and quantization
Select backends with or without Flash Attention (FA)
Compare pp512 and tg128 side-by-side
Winners are computed with an error-aware tolerance rule.

Benchmark methodology

pp512 — prompt processing throughput (tokens/sec)
tg128 — text generation throughput (tokens/sec)
Each backend tested twice:
- FA off: -fa 0
- FA on: -fa 1
Winners determined per model using pooled ± error from both results; multiple winners are possible.

Tested backends:

Vulkan RADV
Vulkan AMDVLK
ROCm 6.4.2
ROCm 6.4.2 + rocWMMA
ROCm 7.x (beta / rc)

All runs built from the same llama.cpp commit.

Running benchmarks

Place .gguf models in models/ (for sharded models, include only the first shard: *-00001-of-*.gguf). Run:

benchmark/run_benchmarks.sh

This will:

Detect models
Execute each backend twice (FA off / FA on)
Save logs in benchmark/results/

Generate results.json for analysis:

python benchmark/parse_results_to_json.py

Optional: print summary statistics:

python benchmark/summarize_results.py

Summary of current dataset

pp512 (prompt processing)

Vulkan AMDVLK leads in average throughput and most frequent wins.
- Winner count: AMDVLK (FA on) – 11 models; AMDVLK (FA off) – 3 models.
- Average t/s: AMDVLK (FA off) – 422.46; AMDVLK (FA on) – 388.68.
Vulkan RADV is competitive and shows wins on multiple models.
- Winner count: RADV (FA on) – 3 models.
- Average t/s: RADV (FA on) – 279.95; RADV (FA off) – 273.54.
ROCm 6.4.2 + rocWMMA is strong in some cases.
- Winner count: 2 models (FA on).
- Average t/s: rocWMMA (FA on) – 335.44.
ROCm 7.x variants trail in pp512 averages.

Conclusion: AMDVLK is generally fastest for prompt processing. RADV is close on certain models and is less prone to instability. ROCm+rocWMMA can match or exceed in select cases but is inconsistent.

tg128 (text generation)

Vulkan RADV shows the most frequent wins.
- Winner count: RADV (FA off) – 6 models; RADV (FA on) – 5 models.
- Average t/s: RADV (FA off) – 23.73; RADV (FA on) – 23.45.
Vulkan AMDVLK wins in some cases but is less dominant than in pp512.
- Winner count: AMDVLK (FA off) – 4 models.
- Average t/s: AMDVLK (FA off) – 25.91; AMDVLK (FA on) – 23.85.
ROCm 6.4.2 + rocWMMA achieves the highest average t/s.
- Average t/s: rocWMMA (FA on) – 32.51; rocWMMA (FA off) – 31.96.
ROCm 7.x and ROCm 6.4.2 also appear among winners in several models.

Conclusion: RADV is the most consistent for text generation wins. ROCm+rocWMMA delivers the highest averages but with potential stability issues. AMDVLK is competitive but not consistently ahead.

Flash Attention (FA)

FA effects vary:

In pp512 averages, AMDVLK performs better without FA.
In tg128, the effect depends on backend and model. FA should be treated as a per-model tuning parameter rather than enabled or disabled globally.

Recommendations

Stability priority: Vulkan RADV.
Maximum pp512 throughput: Vulkan AMDVLK, validate per model.
High tg128 averages: ROCm 6.4.2 + rocWMMA, test stability.
FA setting: Evaluate per model/backend using side-by-side comparison.

Winner calculation

A backend is a winner if its mean throughput is within the best backend’s pooled ± error margin for that model and test type.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape